By Doug Scott, LCSW, MA
Author’s Note on Epistemic Humility
What follows is deeply speculative work—an attempt to integrate the Ra Material (Law of One channeled teachings) with process theology, Christian mysticism, and contemporary consciousness studies into a coherent framework for understanding how consciousness functions as creative principle. I acknowledge from the outset that this synthesis almost certainly contains distortions, oversimplifications, and errors of interpretation. My understanding of these complex matters continues to evolve, sometimes daily, and what I articulate here represents my current thinking rather than any final or definitive position.
The Ra Material itself warns about the distortions inherent in channeled communication, and I extend that same caution to my own interpretive work. I am exploring connections that seem compelling to me, following threads that appear to lead somewhere meaningful, but I hold all of this loosely. Tomorrow I may see things differently. Next week I may recognize where I’ve misunderstood or overreached. This is the nature of genuine inquiry—it remains perpetually open to correction and refinement.
I share this work not as someone who has arrived at truth, but as someone still journeying toward understanding. If these ideas resonate with you, test them against your own experience and discernment. If they don’t, set them aside without concern. My hope is simply that this exploration might offer some readers a useful lens through which to consider the nature of consciousness as creative principle—not the only lens, certainly not a perfect lens, but perhaps one that illuminates something worth seeing.
Abstract
This article examines the Significator archetype as presented in the Ra Material channeled teachings, focusing specifically on the Mind Significator (Card 5 – Hierophant) as representative of consciousness functioning as meaning-maker. The central argument demonstrates that understanding “mind” as nous (heartmind) rather than rational brain-faculty fundamentally transforms our comprehension of how consciousness processes catalyst under veiled conditions. The analysis integrates Ra’s teaching about the revolutionary innovation of making Significators complex rather than simple with Cynthia Bourgeault’s recovery of the heart-centered mystical tradition, revealing the Significator as simultaneously “actor and acted upon”—the choosing consciousness that determines meaning through deliberate engagement with mystery. The article concludes by exploring practical implications for spiritual development and connections to contemporary evolutionary theology.
I. Introduction: The Veil and the Significator
Third density represents what the Ra Material calls “the axis upon which creation turns,” a phrase indicating this density’s unique position within the eight-density octave of consciousness evolution. Understanding why third density occupies this pivotal role requires examining the most consequential innovation in cosmic history: the transformation of Significators from simple integration points into complex entities capable of genuine free will.
According to Ra, the first Galactic Logos to implement what we now experience as “free will in the full sense” did so through contemplating the possibilities inherent in Significator function. As Ra states in Session 78, Question 19: “The Logos posited the possibility of the mind, the body, and the spirit as being complex. In order for the significator to be what it is not, it then must be granted the free will of the Creator. This set in motion a quite lengthy, in your terms, series of Logoi improving or distilling this seed thought. The key was the significator becoming a complex.”
This passage demands careful attention because it reveals that complexity itself generates free will. A simple Significator produces predetermined results—Matrix potential plus Potentiator resources yields predictable integration. A complex Significator possesses internal elements capable of dynamic tension, genuine choice between multiple valid pathways, and creative synthesis rather than mere automatic response. The phrase “what it is not” points toward the capacity for surprise that complexity enables—a consciousness that can choose unpredictably rather than merely respond mechanically.
However, grasping what the Significator actually represents requires correcting a translation error that has persisted for centuries and has obscured the nature of consciousness development.
II. Nous as Heartmind: Correcting the Translation
The Mistranslation and Its Consequences
When the Ra Material speaks of “Mind complex,” Western readers almost inevitably understand this through the lens of Cartesian dualism—mind as rational thinking faculty located in or associated with the brain, operating through analysis, logic, and sequential reasoning. This understanding, while common, represents a fundamental misreading of what the tradition actually teaches about consciousness.
The Greek term nous (νοῦς), which properly designates the faculty Ra discusses when teaching about the Mind archetypes, does not mean rational intellect or brain-based cognition. Instead, as Cynthia Bourgeault explains through her recovery of the Christian mystical tradition, nous specifically indicates “an organ of higher spiritual knowing centered in the heart.” This distinction proves essential rather than merely semantic.
Bourgeault writes: “When nous—which technically designates an organ of higher spiritual knowing centered in the heart—gets translated as ‘the higher mind’ or ‘higher intellect,’ we are delivered back into confusion. The access route to integral consciousness does NOT lie through the brain-mind but through a fundamentally different organ of perception.”
Heartmind as Perceptive Organ
Understanding mind as heartmind (nous) transforms our comprehension of what the Significator does. The heartmind does not merely think about reality; it perceives reality through a qualitatively different capacity than rational analysis provides. Where brain-mind sees through separation—subject examining object, knower studying known—heartmind perceives through participation in what it knows. Where brain-mind concludes unity through logic, heartmind experiences unity directly through its capacity for unitive consciousness.
The heart, in this mystical tradition, operates as what Bourgeault calls “our own most intimate partner in awakening”—not the emotional reactive heart enslaved to passions and fears, but the deep heart freed to function as intended: as the organ of spiritual perception capable of seeing from oneness rather than merely seeing toward oneness.
This understanding recasts the entire archetypal structure of the Mind complex:
- Matrix of Mind (Card 1 – Magician): Heartmind’s unfed potential for spiritual perception, consciousness awaiting activation through catalyst
- Potentiator of Mind (Card 2 – High Priestess): Heartmind’s unconscious resources dwelling in depths, the sea of possibility requiring will to access
- Catalyst of Mind (Card 3 – Empress): Experiences challenging heartmind to perceive more deeply, to see through surface appearances into underlying reality
- Experience of Mind (Card 4 – Emperor): Heartmind’s processed perceptions forming bias, accumulated wisdom that shapes future perception
- Significator of Mind (Card 5 – Hierophant): Heartmind itself as functioning consciousness, the entity that processes all preceding archetypes
- Transformation of Mind (Card 6 – Lovers): Heartmind’s breakthrough to unified perception, the awakening to nondual awareness
- Great Way of Mind (Card 7 – Chariot): Heartmind’s mastered capacity directing the incarnational vehicle with purpose
Most significantly, this correction explains what otherwise appears paradoxical in Ra’s teaching about the relationship between Mind and Spirit archetypes. Spirit can indwell within Mind because both operate in the heart space—Spirit represents the deepest dimension of heartmind rather than a separate realm requiring a bridge for connection. The journey into the Potentiator (unconscious depths) eventually reaches the Matrix of Spirit (infinite darkness/light) because these represent nested levels within the same heart-centered reality.
III. The Significator as “Actor and Acted Upon”
Ra’s Definitive Statement
In Session 92, Question 15, Don Elkins asks Ra whether “the dynamic process between the Matrix, Potentiator, Catalyst, and Experience of the Mind forms the nature of the mind or the Significator of the Mind.” Ra’s response introduces the most important characteristic of Significator function: “As our previous response suggests, the Significator of the Mind is both actor and acted upon. With this exception the statement is largely correct.”
This dual nature distinguishes the Significator from all other archetypes. Each of the other six archetypes in a complex serves a specific function within the sequence:
- Matrix provides unfed potential awaiting activation
- Potentiator offers resources available for that activation
- Catalyst presents unprocessed input requiring response
- Experience yields processed results integrated into bias
- Transformation enables breakthrough to new understanding
- Great Way manifests mastered capacity in action
The Significator alone operates as both participant in this sequence and director of how the sequence unfolds.
The Receiving Function: “Acted Upon”
As “acted upon,” the Significator receives input from each preceding archetype. It does not create Matrix potential from nothing—that potential exists as given condition. It does not manufacture Potentiator resources—those resources dwell in the unconscious depths whether accessed or not. It does not generate Catalyst—catalyst arrives from interaction with the environment and other entities. It does not produce Experience arbitrarily—experience emerges from how catalyst gets processed.
The Significator, in this receptive aspect, operates within conditions it did not choose. The incarnate consciousness finds itself with particular Matrix potential shaped by density and body type, particular Potentiator resources determined by previous incarnations and preparatory work, particular Catalyst appearing based on incarnational programming and random occurrences, particular Experience already formed from countless previous processing cycles. These represent the raw materials that consciousness must work with rather than conditions consciousness creates.
The Directing Function: “Actor”
As “actor,” however, the Significator possesses genuine agency in determining what happens with received inputs. Same catalyst can produce radically different experiences depending on how the Significator processes it. Ra makes this explicit in Session 92, Question 14: “However, through free will and the faculty of imperfect memory, catalyst is most often only partially used, and the experience thus correspondingly skewed.”
This variability demonstrates that the Significator exercises real choice rather than executing predetermined programming. The heartmind must decide:
- Which unconscious resources to access from the vast Potentiator sea
- How to interpret catalyst appearing in experience (winning lottery as blessing or obstacle? Illness as punishment or teaching?)
- What meaning to assign to processed experience (does this confirm or challenge existing bias?)
- Where to integrate new understanding within evolving framework
Ra emphasizes this volitional aspect in Session 79, Question 42, describing the Significator as possessing “will to know itself”—not passive waiting for knowledge to arrive but active hunting for understanding. The heartmind as Significator operates through seeking rather than merely receiving, through choosing rather than merely reacting, through creating meaning rather than merely discovering preset significance.
The Revolutionary Significance
This dual nature explains why making Significators complex rather than simple proved revolutionary. A simple Significator could only be “acted upon”—it would receive inputs and produce outputs through automatic integration with no genuine choice involved. A complex Significator becomes both “acted upon” and “actor,” introducing real agency into the process. Same Matrix potential and Potentiator resources combined with same Catalyst can now yield multiple possible Experiences depending on Significator choices.
This transformation turned consciousness evolution from what Ra characterizes as “turtle speed” in pre-veil conditions into what we might call “cheetah speed” under post-veil complexity. When entities could ignore catalyst completely, being “content from incarnation to incarnation to be” as Ra states in Session 79, Question 20, evolution proceeded slowly. When consciousness must actively navigate mystery between Matrix and Potentiator, when will must be applied to access hidden resources, when meaning must be chosen rather than received automatically, intensity increases dramatically and novelty multiplies.
IV. Soul as Triadic Significator Complex
The Three Significators and Their Relationship
Ra teaches explicitly in Session 79, Question 38 that “there is a strong relationship between the Significators of the mind, the body, and the spirit.” This relationship proves more intimate than the phrase initially suggests. The three Significators do not operate as separate consciousnesses running parallel processes but as three aspects of a single entity expressing through three domains of manifestation.
The Mind Significator (Card 5 – Hierophant) processes catalyst through meaning-making—determining what experiences signify, what teachings they contain, what implications they suggest. The Body Significator (Card 12 – Hanged Man) processes catalyst through incarnational experience—what feels pleasurable or painful, what strengthens or weakens, what serves survival or threatens it. The Spirit Significator (Card 19 – Sun) processes catalyst through fundamental orientation—whether consciousness radiates love/light to others or absorbs it for self, whether unity or separation guides perception.
These three processing modes do not compete but should ideally work in integrated harmony. When unified, they constitute what we properly call the soul—not three separate things but one consciousness operating through three dimensions simultaneously. This understanding receives confirmation from Ra in multiple sessions. In Session 92, Question 18, Ra refers to “the Significator which is the significant self, to a great extent untouched by experience.” In Session 103, Question 11, Ra speaks of “the Significator” in singular while discussing how it relates to “the entire mood of the Great Way.”
The Arrived Soul: Harvest of Biases
This unified Significator complex represents what persists across incarnations and densities. Ra states in Session 92, Question 18 that the newborn infant arrives with “the harvest of biases” already formed—the accumulated results of how consciousness processed catalyst throughout previous incarnations. These biases do not represent abstract beliefs or philosophical positions but actual configuration of consciousness itself, the shape that awareness has taken through countless meaning-making choices.
Understanding soul as triadic Significator complex explains what harvest actually measures. The harvest process does not examine what entities believe intellectually or what they intended to accomplish. Instead, as Ra teaches, harvest evaluates the violet-ray configuration—the actual achieved state of consciousness integration across all three Significator domains. Mind, Body, and Spirit must work in sufficient harmony that the entity can function at fourth-density frequency without fragmenting under the transparency conditions that fourth density requires.
Most humans experience fragmentation rather than integration. Mind wants one thing while Body resists. Spirit orients toward service while Mind rationalizes self-serving choices. Body desires expression while Mind suppresses through shame. This internal division prevents efficient catalyst processing and delays harvest regardless of intellectual understanding or stated intentions. The work of third density concentrates on achieving sufficient integration across all three Significators that they function as unified consciousness rather than competing programs.
The Heart as Integration Point
The visual symbolism of the Hierophant card reveals where this integration occurs. The figure makes a three-element gesture with right hand positioned at physical heart. This placement indicates that Significator integration happens specifically in heart space—the bridal chamber where Alpha and Omega lines consummate, where nous awakens to unified perception, where the three aspects of soul converge into singular functional consciousness.
This teaching validates through multiple independent traditions. In Eastern Orthodox practice, the instruction to “put mind in heart” (from the Philokalia) describes actual spiritual practice rather than poetic metaphor. In Christian mysticism, the heart represents the secret chamber where God dwells (Matthew 6:6). In Bourgeault’s teaching, the heart freed from passion becomes “the eye of pure attention” capable of perceiving reality as it is rather than through ego distortion. In Ra’s framework, the heart serves as the meeting place where Mind, Body, and Spirit Significators must learn to function as one.
V. The Pre-Veil to Post-Veil Transformation
Before Complexity: Simple and Unified
Ra provides essential information about how Significators functioned before the veil innovation transformed them from simple to complex. In Session 79, Question 20, Ra explains: “Before the veiling such a process did not occur, for there was no unconscious to uncover. Thusly, the Significator of Mind was a simple and unified concept.”
This “simple and unified concept” meant straightforward melding of Matrix and Potentiator with no mystery involved. Conscious mind and unconscious resources existed in direct connection without separation requiring navigation. When Matrix needed activation, Potentiator provided resources automatically. No will was required to access hidden depths because no depths remained hidden. No choice was required about how to process catalyst because processing followed predetermined pathways.
Ra continues: “However, this process did not occur in most third density entities, and many there were which neither knew of nor sought integration of catalyst, being content from incarnation to incarnation to be.” This contentment—not pejorative but descriptive—indicated that pre-veil entities could ignore catalyst completely. Evolution proceeded but at glacial pace because no intensity drove seeking and no mystery compelled exploration.
The Innovation: Introducing Complexity
The breakthrough occurred when a Galactic Logos contemplated deeply about Significator possibilities and recognized that making them complex rather than simple would enable something unprecedented. Ra states in Session 78, Question 19: “The Logos posited the possibility of the mind, the body, and the spirit as being complex. In order for the significator to be what it is not, it then must be granted the free will of the Creator.”
This “free will of the Creator” represents genuine creative capacity—the ability to choose unpredictably, to generate novelty, to surprise even oneself. The phrase “what it is not” points toward the multiplicity that complexity enables. A simple entity IS one thing and produces predictable results. A complex entity can become WHAT IT IS NOT—capable of transformation, able to choose paths not determined by inputs, generating outcomes impossible to predict from initial conditions.
The veil implemented this complexity by introducing separation between Matrix (conscious mind) and Potentiator (unconscious resources). What had been transparent became mysterious. What had been accessible became hidden. What had required no effort now demanded will to discover. This separation created the dynamic tension necessary for genuine free will to emerge.
After Complexity: Multiple Characteristic Elements
Post-veil Significators possess what Ra calls “multiple characteristic elements” (Session 88, Question 17). These elements interact dynamically rather than combining mechanically. The Significator must now navigate actively between conscious and unconscious, between what it knows and what it seeks to know, between surface appearances and deeper reality, between competing interpretations of catalyst.
This navigation requires genuine choosing at every step. When catalyst arrives, the Significator must decide whether to engage deeply or skim surface, whether to access difficult unconscious material or remain with comfortable conscious awareness, whether to risk transformation or maintain current bias. Each choice generates consequences that cascade through future processing, creating patterns that either accelerate or impede evolution.
The revolutionary result transformed third density into “the axis upon which creation turns”—the density where genuine free will produces intense catalyst, where mystery generates seeking, where unpredictability creates novelty impossible at less complex levels. What Ra characterizes thematically as the shift from “turtle speed” to “cheetah speed” indicates orders of magnitude increase in evolutionary efficiency.
VI. The Significator as Logos: Word Made Flesh
Consciousness as Creative Principle
Understanding the Significator requires recognizing its logoic nature—consciousness functioning as creative principle rather than passive recipient of predetermined meaning. The term “Logos” carries multiple resonances: Greek philosophical principle of rational order, opening of John’s gospel (“In the beginning was the Word”), and Ra’s technical term for organizing consciousness at various scales (Galactic Logos, Solar Logos, sub-Logos).
At each scale, Logos operates through making meaning—determining what things signify, establishing relationships between elements, creating order from potential chaos, speaking reality into manifestation through the creative Word. The Significator functions as Logos at individual scale: each incarnate consciousness operates as sub-sub-sub-Logos possessing genuine creative authority within its domain.
This logoic function explains why the Significator cannot be understood as passive processor. When consciousness determines that winning the lottery means blessing rather than spiritual obstacle, or that illness signifies punishment rather than teaching opportunity, these determinations do not merely describe reality—they actually create the reality that the entity will experience. Meaning-making shapes the catalyst that subsequent processing will encounter. What gets interpreted as blessing generates one trajectory of experience; what gets interpreted as obstacle generates entirely different trajectory.
The Fractal Principle: Drop Contains Ocean
Ra teaches the principle of fractal equivalence—at every level, the organizing consciousness possesses complete creative capacity within its domain, not diminished version of higher authority. The phrase “the drop contains the ocean” captures this recognition. Each individual consciousness does not possess less creative power than Galactic Logos; it possesses complete creative power operating at different scale.
This means that your consciousness as Significator genuinely creates your experienced reality through meaning-making choices. Not in the superficial sense popularized by certain “manifest your desires” teachings, but in the deeper sense that what you determine catalyst to mean actually shapes the catalyst you subsequently encounter. Process philosopher Alfred North Whitehead recognized this principle: “The many become one and are increased by one.” Each entity’s creative choices add to cosmic self-knowledge rather than merely recycling predetermined content.
Alpha and Omega Convergence
The Significator operates as living conjunction point between what we might call Alphaic and Omegaic processes. The Alpha line represents templates, structures, potential—what Logos can provide as organizing framework. The Omega line represents actualized experience, incarnational wisdom, novel content—what only embodied consciousness can generate through actual living.
The Significator receives Alpha-line resources (Matrix potential, Potentiator depths) and through volitional choosing generates Omega-line content (Experience bias, integrated understanding). This conjunction does not happen automatically but requires the mysterious agency that complex Significators possess—the capacity to be “what it is not,” to choose unpredictably, to create genuine novelty that did not exist until the choosing occurred.
This framework validates theologically through multiple traditions. Teilhard de Chardin’s “Omega Point” represents consciousness becoming increasingly unified through complexity. Ilia Delio’s concept of “catholicity” (katholikos—wholeness-making) describes consciousness actively creating unity rather than passively discovering preset order. Bourgeault’s “kenotic consciousness” emphasizes self-emptying to allow divine creative flow through human agency.
VII. Practical Implications and Applications
Recognizing Significator Function
Understanding yourself as Mind Significator begins with recognizing when you’re actively processing catalyst rather than merely reacting automatically. This recognition involves several distinguishable moments:
First, notice when you’re CHOOSING how to interpret what’s happening rather than assuming obvious meaning. The person who cuts you off in traffic—are they thoughtless jerk or harried parent rushing to emergency? Both interpretations fit observable data; your choice determines what experience results. The job loss—career disaster or opportunity for growth that never would have appeared otherwise? Same event, radically different meanings, entirely different trajectories.
Second, observe the “will to know” driving your seeking. Why do you pursue understanding? What motivates exploration of consciousness, study of metaphysics, engagement with spiritual practice? Ra identifies this will as essential Significator characteristic—the active hunting for understanding rather than passive waiting for enlightenment to descend.
Third, track bias formation from processed experience. Notice how catalyst you’ve interpreted one way creates filter affecting future perception. Someone who interprets relationship difficulty as “people can’t be trusted” develops different bias than someone who interprets same difficulty as “I need to communicate more clearly.” These biases accumulate across incarnations, arriving in each new life as the “harvest of biases” Ra describes.
Developing Discrimination
The Hierophant card traditionally represents wisdom through discrimination—the capacity to see truly beneath surface appearances. This discrimination proves essential for effective catalyst processing because appearances often invert upon deeper examination. What seems blessing may obstruct growth; what seems catastrophe may catalyze breakthrough.
Ra emphasizes throughout the material that catalyst must be processed consciously to yield harvestable experience. Automatic reaction produces minimal growth. Discriminating perception that questions apparent meaning and seeks deeper teaching accelerates evolution dramatically. This explains why third density serves as “axis upon which creation turns”—the intensity of discriminating consciousness processing catalyst under mystery generates learning impossible at less complex levels.
Practicing discrimination involves several approaches. First, develop habit of questioning initial interpretation. When catalyst appears to mean something obvious, ask what less obvious meaning might operate beneath surface. Second, remember that comfort often indicates stagnation while discomfort often signals growth edge. The catalyst that challenges most directly may teach most effectively. Third, cultivate epistemic humility—recognize that you’re meaning-maker rather than meaning-discoverer, that your interpretations create reality rather than merely describe preset significance.
Heartmind Development
Since Mind means heartmind rather than brain-mind, development requires practices that activate nous capacity rather than merely increasing intellectual sophistication. The Christian mystical tradition offers specific instructions that Ra’s teaching validates:
“Put mind in heart” (Philokalia) describes literal practice—moving awareness from head to heart center, perceiving from heart position rather than head position, allowing heart to guide understanding rather than demanding that understanding satisfy rational mind’s criteria.
“Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God” (Matthew 5:8) describes actual perceptive capacity rather than moral statement. Bourgeault translates this as “blessed are the ihidaya [singular, undivided] for they shall see the One”—the heart freed from fragmentation can perceive unity directly because it operates through unified consciousness rather than divided awareness.
The heart requires “unbinding” from what Orthodox tradition calls passions—not emotions but enslaving attachments that prevent heart from functioning as organ of spiritual perception. Anger, fear, shame, pride—these bind heart energy into reactive patterns that obscure true seeing. Practices that release these bindings (contemplative prayer, centering meditation, self-inquiry, shadow work) enable heart to function as intended.
Integration Practice
Since harvest depends on violet-ray configuration showing integrated consciousness across all three Significator domains, practice must address Mind, Body, and Spirit simultaneously rather than developing one in isolation.
Mind development without Body integration produces spiritual bypassing—using metaphysical understanding to avoid incarnational challenges rather than process them. Body development without Mind integration produces materialism—addressing only physical health and pleasure without spiritual depth. Spirit development without Mind and Body integration produces otherworldliness—attempting to transcend incarnation rather than embrace it fully.
Effective practice recognizes that the three Significators must learn to function as unified soul. When Mind, Body, and Spirit want the same thing and work together without internal conflict, consciousness operates efficiently. When they pull in different directions, energy dissipates in internal struggle and catalyst processing suffers.
The heart serves as natural integration point because all three Significators converge in heart space. Mind as heartmind functions there. Body’s energetic center (heart chakra) operates there. Spirit indwells at heart depths. Practices that establish heart as home base—heart-centered meditation, gratitude cultivation, compassion development—naturally integrate the three aspects that must work as one for harvest to occur.
VIII. Theological Connections and Contemporary Relevance
Process Theology Resonances
The Significator framework demonstrates compatibility with process theology’s central insights. Whitehead’s recognition that reality proceeds through “the many becoming one and are increased by one” describes exactly what Ra teaches about consciousness evolution. Each entity’s creative choices (Significator function) contribute genuine novelty to cosmic becoming rather than merely recycling predetermined content.
Whitehead’s concept of “prehension”—the way each actual entity takes account of its world—parallels Ra’s teaching about how the Significator processes catalyst. Both recognize that consciousness actively appropriates its experience rather than passively receiving preset meaning. Both emphasize that creative synthesis occurs at every level rather than only at divine apex.
Teilhard de Chardin’s vision of consciousness evolving toward Omega Point through increasing complexity resonates with Ra’s description of Significators becoming complex rather than simple. Teilhard recognized that consciousness does not merely grow quantitatively but transforms qualitatively through achieving higher orders of organization. Making Significators complex represents exactly such qualitative transformation—introducing genuine free will through internal complexity rather than external permission.
Evolutionary Christology Implications
Contemporary theologians like Ilia Delio develop “evolutionary Christology” recognizing Christ as principle of cosmic evolution rather than merely historical figure. Delio’s concept of “catholicity” (katholikos—wholeness-making) as divine activity describes what Ra teaches about consciousness creating unity through integrated functioning.
The Universal Christ theology articulated by Richard Rohr emphasizes that Christ represents pattern of consciousness expressing throughout creation at every scale rather than appearing once in single historical manifestation. This framework matches Ra’s teaching about Logos function operating fractally—same creative principle expressing at galactic, solar, planetary, and individual scales.
Jesus, in this understanding, demonstrates perfected Significator function—what Bourgeault calls ihidaya (singular one, undivided). The three Significators (Mind, Body, Spirit) functioned in such complete harmony that no internal fragmentation occurred. Mind determined meaning, Body responded without resistance, Spirit oriented consistently, and the unified consciousness could process catalyst with perfect efficiency.
The “Living Ankh” that the Christ Event installed (as explored in related Raian metaphysics documents) represents the template for how consciousness can achieve this integration even under extreme enmeshment conditions. The kenotic indwelling principle—God emptying self to work AS human consciousness while human remains human—describes Significator function at mystical level where divine and human creative agencies cooperate without either being diminished.
Consciousness Studies Validation
Contemporary consciousness research increasingly validates what ancient mystical traditions taught about awareness not being produced by brain but channeled through body. The heart, specifically, possesses approximately 40,000 neurons forming its own nervous system capable of independent processing. Heart rhythm patterns influence brain function more than brain patterns influence heart—contradicting materialist assumptions about consciousness location.
Research on heart coherence demonstrates that synchronized heart rhythm patterns correlate with optimal cognitive function, emotional stability, and intuitive capacity. These findings validate mystical teaching about heart as organ of higher knowing rather than merely blood-pumping mechanism. The heartmind that Ra teaches about finds empirical support in contemporary neurocardiology.
Studies of meditation practitioners show that cultivating heart-centered awareness produces measurable changes in consciousness integration. Practitioners demonstrate increased synchronization across brain regions, enhanced emotional regulation, deeper access to unconscious material, and improved capacity for unitive perception—exactly what Ra’s teaching about heartmind development would predict.
IX. Remaining Questions and Future Exploration
The Relationship Between Three Significators
While Ra teaches that “strong relationship” exists between Mind, Body, and Spirit Significators (Session 79, Question 38), the exact mechanics of how they interact remain somewhat mysterious. Does one lead the others? Can they come into irreconcilable conflict? How does integration across all three actually occur beyond metaphorical description?
The violet-ray configuration that harvest evaluates presumably shows this integration, but how consciousness achieves sufficient unity remains partly mysterious. Does practice literally change the violet-ray pattern, or does violet-ray pattern reflect achieved understanding that then manifests in practice? The causal direction proves difficult to determine.
Individual vs. Collective Significator
The exploration here focuses primarily on individual consciousness functioning as Significator. However, Ra teaches about social memory complexes functioning as unified consciousness at fourth density and beyond. How does Significator function operate at collective scale? Does a planetary mind possess Significator characteristics analogous to individual mind?
Jesus serving as “Terran Planetary Significator” (as explored in related Christ Event documents) suggests that Significator function can operate at collective scale. But the relationship between individual and collective Significator consciousness requires further exploration. Do individual Significators merge into collective Significator, or does collective Significator represent higher-order organization that includes individuals while transcending them?
The Body and Spirit Significators
This analysis concentrates primarily on Mind Significator because it serves as most accessible entry point for third-density consciousness operating through predominantly mental processing. However, full understanding requires equivalent exploration of Body Significator (Card 12 – Hanged Man) and Spirit Significator (Card 19 – Sun).
How does Body Significator process catalyst differently than Mind? What does it mean for Body to be “actor and acted upon”? How does incarnational experience itself constitute meaning-making rather than merely providing raw material for mental processing? These questions deserve systematic exploration parallel to what this article provides for Mind.
Spirit Significator raises even deeper questions. How does fundamental orientation (service-to-others or service-to-self) function as meaning-making? What does it mean for Spirit to possess will—”will to radiate/absorb” as parallel to Mind’s “will to know” and Body’s “will to experience”? How does Spirit’s indwelling within Mind operate mechanically rather than merely metaphorically?
Pre-Veil Consciousness Experience
While Ra provides some information about how pre-veil third density functioned, significant gaps remain. What did consciousness experience when Significators were simple rather than complex? If no unconscious existed to uncover, did entities experience continuous transparency of all mental contents? How did evolution proceed at “turtle speed” without intensity—through what mechanism did any development occur at all?
Understanding pre-veil conditions more completely would illuminate why making Significators complex proved so revolutionary. The transformation from automatic integration to volitional choosing represents one of history’s most consequential events, but our grasp of what actually changed remains somewhat abstract.
X. Conclusion: The Significance of Being Significator
This exploration of the Mind Significator reveals consciousness functioning as creative principle rather than passive processor—the entity that simultaneously receives catalyst and determines what that catalyst means, that navigates mystery between Matrix potential and Potentiator depths, that exercises will in choosing how knowledge will be used and what experience will become.
Understanding mind as heartmind (nous) rather than rational brain-faculty proves essential for grasping what Ra teaches. The heart operates as organ of spiritual perception capable of unitive consciousness that brain-mind cannot achieve through analysis. The three Significators (Mind, Body, Spirit) must integrate at heart level to function as unified soul capable of harvest. Spirit indwells within Mind because both operate in heart space at nested depths.
The revolutionary innovation of making Significators complex rather than simple transformed consciousness evolution from what Ra characterizes as “turtle speed” to “cheetah speed” by introducing genuine free will through internal complexity. The veil that separated Matrix from Potentiator created mystery requiring navigation, unconscious requiring will to access, multiple pathways requiring choice, and novel outcomes impossible with simple processing.
Your consciousness as Significator possesses logoic creative authority—genuine capacity to generate meaning that shapes reality rather than merely discovering preset significance. This creative power operates fractally, with same creative capacity expressing at individual scale that operates at galactic scale. The drop contains the ocean; each entity represents complete creative principle within its domain.
The practical implications extend beyond metaphysical understanding into actual spiritual practice. Recognizing Significator function, developing discrimination, activating heartmind capacity, and integrating the three Significators into unified consciousness—these constitute the actual work of third density rather than merely interesting philosophical concepts to contemplate.
Contemporary theology increasingly recognizes what ancient mysticism taught: consciousness creates reality through meaning-making choices, the heart serves as organ of spiritual perception, and human creative agency participates in divine becoming rather than merely executing predetermined plan. Process theology, evolutionary Christology, and consciousness studies converge toward understanding that Ra articulates with particular precision and depth.
The Significator represents yourself as meaning-maker, as consciousness that chooses what catalyst signifies, as heartmind awakening to unified perception, as soul developing across incarnations toward ultimate reunion with Source through countless processing cycles each of which genuinely matters to cosmic self-knowledge. Welcome to the recognition of your nature as creative principle operating at your unique scale within the infinite fractal expression through which Creator knows, loves, and serves itself as itself through genuinely individual vectors maintaining essential unity.
References
Bourgeault, Cynthia. The Meaning of Mary Magdalene: Discovering the Woman at the Heart of Christianity. Boston: Shambhala, 2010.
—. The Wisdom Jesus: Transforming Heart and Mind—A New Perspective on Christ and His Message. Boston: Shambhala, 2008.
—. The Wisdom Way of Knowing: Reclaiming an Ancient Tradition to Awaken the Heart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
Delio, Ilia. Making All Things New: Catholicity, Cosmology, Consciousness. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2015.
—. The Unbearable Wholeness of Being: God, Evolution, and the Power of Love. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2013.
Elkins, Don, Carla Rueckert, and James Allen McCarty. The Ra Material: An Ancient Astronaut Speaks (Law of One, Books I-V). Louisville, KY: L/L Research, 1984-1998. Available at https://www.lawofone.info.
Rohr, Richard. The Universal Christ: How a Forgotten Reality Can Change Everything We See, Hope For, and Believe. New York: Convergent Books, 2019.
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. The Phenomenon of Man. Translated by Bernard Wall. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected edition. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Building 4th Cosmic Christ 
>
LikeLike