Building 4th Community — Ra Contact & Open Dialogue
AUDIO
We open the way we always do, by naming what we are afraid of and asking that it be blessed. Tonight the fear on the table is disclosure — the growing public conversation about ETs, craft in the skies, information kept out of view for decades. And the first thing I want to say in prayer is the thing that turns out to organize the whole evening: what is being disclosed is nothing to fear if we look at the human race as one Self. For psychological and spiritual wholeness, we incorporate the parts of us that have been hidden. That is true on the micro scale of a single life, and it is true on the macro scale of a species. Disclosure, then, is integration.
I have been watching the disclosure conversation for a long time — long enough to notice how it has matured. Ten years ago the loudest voices framed the people holding information back as agents of some evil cabal. That framing has quieted. Now people speculate about national protection, about what happens to the oil and gas economy if too much is released at once, about the wisest pace for a species that includes a great many people whose theology would buckle under a confirmed ET reality. I am not arguing for slow disclosure or fast disclosure. I am pointing at the question underneath: how does a whole system take back what it has split off, without hating the split-off part?
One of our members put it plainly from the Law of One side. Ra describes a Confederation that waits for the calling and an Orion group that calls itself (Ra, Session 8.12). The Confederation met with Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s — Ra says he encountered thought-forms indistinguishable from third density, and describes him as an extremely positively oriented, congenial person with no distortion toward power (Ra, Session 24.19). The agreement then was to go separate ways and not disclose. What we are feeling now, this member suggested, is the collective’s own desire to know finally becoming loud enough to change that. Ra frames the mechanism as the Law of Squares, or the calling: a whole society’s longing, doubled and redoubled, is felt across creation as a summons (Ra, Session 7.6–7.8). Disclosure comes because the collective is calling for it.
Troy offered a gentler counterpoint. He has spent years with this material, and he finds himself, as he put it, post-disclosure in his emotional life — not indifferent, but released. It will happen as it happens. His prayer is simply to be used, to be a director for souls who will need help transitioning into that world. And he named the honest limit of any threshold: people retain the right to refuse. Some will believe the Earth is flat in the face of every evidence. Denial can spring eternal. So disclosure, whenever it comes, will move some and leave others, and both are inside free will.
From the conventional to the cosmic
The evening kept circling one movement: how a person, or a species, walks from a conventional frame into a wider one without being shattered. In counseling terms, good work helps someone integrate the shadow — the parts they did not even know were there — and you do not do that by hating the shadow. You learn it, accept it, forgive it. That is Ra’s language too. And it is happening, I think, on a macro scale right now.
The theological version is sharper. For many people, the whole architecture hangs on a particular notion of atonement — Jesus dying to reconcile us so we can go to heaven. Introduce ETs and the questions cascade: What does this mean about sin? About the cross? A member raised the further tremor — imagine confirmation that Jesus himself was a fourth-density being, or that the Yahweh of the wilderness was extraterrestrial contact rather than God as such. DeMarcus walked us carefully through the Ra account here, and it holds up against the source. Ra names Yahweh as an entity active among these people, working first by genetic means and then by dialogue (Ra, Sessions 16.14, 18.14). Moses — Ra calls him Moishe — was a person of extreme positivity, and it was precisely his people’s pressure to see wonders, to have physical proof, that opened him to impression from a negative source (Ra, Session 16.18–16.19). The Ten Commandments, in Ra’s telling, carry the signature of negative entities aping positivity, copying its form while keeping a self-serving core (Ra, Session 16.15). The wilderness was a battleground between Confederation and Orion forces over a people already shaped by earlier genetic interference (Ra, Session 24.6). None of this is meant to demolish the tradition. It widens it. The same name, later, takes on transformative fire and begins sending positive philosophy again.
What lets a person hold all this? A member described watching his evangelical brother react far less than expected to ideas that should, by his theology, be heresy — as though some deeper layer already knew. We talked about the strange human capacity to hold two contradictory things at once without letting them inform each other. I once had a teacher with a master’s in physics who believed the Earth was six thousand years old and simply held the two accounts in separate rooms. That is one way through. The better way, I think, is the one Troy named: as we learn to talk to our own parts and discover that our personality is not a single unity, we gain a way to imagine a God who is both transcendent and a multiplicity — a God with parts, a God we can be part of.
The parts and the anchored self
That opened into Internal Family Systems. Troy gave the overview: we are a multiplicity within a unity — fractals, he said. IFS names the cast — managers, firefighters, and the exiles they work to keep hidden (the exiles being what an older vocabulary called the wounded inner child). What multiple-personality clinicians were describing decades ago in language the field rejected has returned, demystified, as parts, and the field can receive it now. A member surfaced the further edge some practitioners explore — Robert Falconer’s The Others Within Us — the possibility of external attachments alongside internal parts. Troy held that lightly; it is out there, unresolved.
Then he shared his screen and showed the other IFS finding — the one that matters most to me. Clear away the exiles and their protectors, and what remains has a recognizable character: the eight C’s — curiosity, calm, confidence, compassion, creativity, clarity, courage, connectedness — and alongside them joy, humor, equanimity, forgiveness, perspective, playfulness. Troy offered several names for it: Richard Rohr’s true self, the anchored self, the essence of who we were created to be, Christ’s self. Different traditions, one clearing. This is perennial wisdom arriving in conventional language we can actually use — the kind of teaching I would call fifth-density, queen’s-chamber learning, coming up and out into ordinary counseling rooms.
The greenhouse
I offered the group a metaphor I have been living with for how the higher densities tend us. Picture a greenhouse. A greenhouse cannot simply be built and left; a master gardener has to read the room, know which plant needs which light, open the vents when it is too hot and close them against the winter. Ra’s Guardians are exactly that kind of gardener — and here the source language is almost too on-the-nose, because Ra calls them “the Guardians, or gardeners, as you may call them” (Ra, Session 21.8). They tend the quarantine around Earth by an exquisitely precise balancing, opening and closing according to the planet’s karmic needs and its calling (Ra, Session 16.1–16.6).
I pushed the image one step further, into the battle between fourth-density positive and negative. Imagine the greenhouse in a Texas July — 105 degrees, every vent open, and still too hot. The metaphysical heat is our own inefficient use of catalyst, our bellicosity, intensifying because we will not learn the lesson. So the gardeners bring in an air conditioner (fourth-density positive) and, opposing it, a heater (fourth-density negative). Their contest, run on the very air of our own making, holds the room at a temperature where a small plant can still be watered and grow. Only the AC and the room would go cold; only the heat and it would wither us. Together they make a livable climate. Ra’s own account of the window balancing says something adjacent — that an equal influx of positive and negative is allowed, balanced by the distortions of the social complex itself (Ra, Session 16.6).
Troy, ever the empath’s advocate, named the cost: philosophically the metaphor consoles, but the sensitive among us feel every hot and cold current directly, and it is genuinely disturbing to them. Fair. Eventually, I think, the empath learns to dress in layers. And a member connected the AC and the heater to real figures in history, and to the day’s news — the way a court ruling can quietly unplug one of the heaters. We let current events sit among us as live catalyst without turning the room into an argument.
The guest house
I closed my own part of the evening with the practice I actually use, drawn from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. ACT does not try to swap a negative thought for a positive one — many people simply cannot do that. It starts somewhere humbler: being human is hard, equanimity is never perfect, and the goal is to lower the intensity of a hard feeling and shorten its duration — from a nine to a two, from three days to three minutes — while dropping the words “positive” and “negative” in favor of “comfortable” and “uncomfortable.”
Here is how I picture it. I am the maître d’ of a banquet, and my emotions are the guests. When shame or anger or a grief-ambush arrives, I do not turn it away. I invite it in, I seat it, I serve it food — and then I turn my gaze, because a hundred other guests are also here: joy, presence, gladness. I leave the hard guest to eat and go attend to the rest. A member heard Rumi’s guest house in that immediately, and she is right — the old image of welcoming each arrival, the joy and the meanness alike, as a guide sent from beyond. Hospitality toward the whole of oneself.
Which is where the whole evening rhymes. The greenhouse and the guest house are the same gesture at different scales: welcome what arrives, tend the climate, refuse to exile any part — the shadow of a species, the hidden parts of a soul, the wider cosmos pressing at the edges of an old theology. The way down is the way up. We integrate, and we grow.
Building 4th Cosmic Christ 